A Challenge to Nishigauchi’s (2016) Analysis of the Specificational Sentencein terms of the ‘Core Noun Phrase’

DOI Web Site Open Access
  • Nishiyama Yuji
    Professor Emeritus Keio University The National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics
  • Nishikawa Ken’ya
    Professor Emeritus Keio University The National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 指定文の分析において「中核名詞句」なる概念はどこまで妥当か
  • フォーラム 指定文の分析において「中核名詞句」なる概念はどこまで妥当か : 西垣内(2016)に対する批判的検討
  • フォーラム シテイブン ノ ブンセキ ニ オイテ 「 チュウカク メイシク 」 ナル ガイネン ワ ドコ マデ ダトウ カ : ニシガキ ナイ(2016)ニ タイスル ヒハンテキ ケントウ
  • ――西垣内（2016）に対する批判的検討――

Search this article

Description

<p>The present article discusses Nishigauchi’s (2016) analysis of the specificational sentence and related constructions in terms of what he calls ‘Core Noun Phrases.’ Core Noun Phrases, according to Nishigauchi, demand both outer and inner arguments; the former delimits the semantic domain of the head Noun while the latter exhaustively specifies the semantic content of the head Noun as delimited by the outer argument. We point out four problems in his analysis: (i) it cannot explain specificational sentences which lack the outer argument, (ii) the alleged exhaustiveness of the specification is not empirically justified, (iii) the notion of ‘discourse operator’ makes wrong predictions, (iv) his analysis of backward binding phenomena misses significant generalizations. From these observations, we argue that his analysis is inadequate for an analysis of the specificational sentence and related constructions such as the kaki ryori construction. We further argue that the theoretical notion ‘Noun Phrases Involving a Variable’ (NPIV; Nishiyama 2003) is crucial in the analysis of the specificational sentence and related constructions, and that the extended notion of Saturated/Unsaturated Nouns (Nishiyama 2003) is indispensable for the adequate analysis of the kaki ryori construction.</p>

Journal

Related Projects

See more

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top