-
- 七五三 泰輔
- 京都大学大学院アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科
書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- Monitoring and Documentation Method for Politics in the Process of Participatory Action Plan Development: An Analysis of Process Documentation of Environment Conservation Project
- 参加型計画立案の実践プロセスに見る政治性のモニタリングと記録の方法について--環境保全プロジェクトのプロセス・ドキュメンテーションの分析から
- サンカガタ ケイカク リツアン ノ ジッセン プロセス ニ ミル セイジセイ ノ モニタリング ト キロク ノ ホウホウ ニ ツイテ カンキョウ ホゼン プロジェクト ノ プロセス ドキュメンテーション ノ ブンセキ カラ
- ―環境保全プロジェクトのプロセス・ドキュメンテーションの分析から―
この論文をさがす
説明
<p>Participatory approaches now seem to be mainstreamed in international developments that are applied to each stage of project. Earlier outsiders controlled and dictated policies and projects designed to develop the disadvantaged, but now the newly developed participatory approaches have replaced them. In other words, disadvantaged people are expected to be not only beneficiaries but also the subject of project activities, such as planning, organizing, and assessing. However, as is already disclosed by ethnographic studies of development projects, assumed beneficiaries never held collective claim as a project assumed; instead it held multiple. A target group is never monolithic, but hybrid while process of a project is never linear, but contingent. People's action in participatory activity is never cooperative, but political.</p><p>In this paper, I have laid an effort to scrutinize the effectiveness of “process documentation (PD)” as a monitoring tool to reveal politics in participatory activities. Demonstrating the process of political negotiation on participation and resource distribution, I have explained that the way in which each actor such as fisher, large farmer, local businessman, NGO staffs, and different interest groups compete and ally each other for their different objectives in the project. Thereafter, I have suggested two important possibilities of PD: first of all, I suggest that PD will be a resource for practitioners who are involved in politics to legitimize their experiences and understanding of the political situation in their activities and claim to modify policy model and bridge the gap between model and practice; secondly, I demonstrate importance of PD as “versatile ethnography” of project and suggest possibility of an anthropologist to assume the role to bridge between policy model and practice in development.</p>
収録刊行物
-
- 国際開発研究
-
国際開発研究 18 (1), 37-52, 2009-06-15
国際開発学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390283659833261824
-
- NII論文ID
- 130007775419
-
- NII書誌ID
- AN10439507
-
- ISSN
- 24345296
- 13423045
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 10368515
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDLサーチ
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可