Clinical evaluation of two different surface implants after iliac bone grafting

DOI IR
  • 髙藤 恭子
    Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Implantology School of Dentistry, Iwate Medical University
  • 鬼原 英道
    Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Implantology School of Dentistry, Iwate Medical University
  • 畠山 航
    Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Implantology School of Dentistry, Iwate Medical University
  • 横田 潤
    Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Implantology School of Dentistry, Iwate Medical University
  • 折祖 研太
    Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Implantology School of Dentistry, Iwate Medical University
  • 近藤 尚知
    Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Implantology School of Dentistry, Iwate Medical University

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 腸骨移植後に埋入した2 種類の異なる表面性状の インプラント体の臨床的検討

Search this article

Abstract

<p>In recent years, dental implants have become indispensable treatment for missing teeth, and the development of the implant surface has been advanced. So far, comparative studies on maxillary sinus floor elevation by iliac crest have been reported and have often employed machined surface implants. On the other hand, there have been few reports, comparing different implant surfaces. In this case report, two different patients with highly atrophic maxilla had anodized surface implants or sandblasted with large grit and acid-etched （SLA） surface implants placed after reconstruction by maxillary sinus floor elevation with iliac bone graft. Case 1: A thirty-six-year-old male. In August 2010, bilateral maxillary sinus floor elevation was performed using iliac bone. In December of the same year, anodized surface implants were placed. Case 2: A forty-eight-year-old male. In December 2010, bilateral maxillary sinus elevation was performed using iliac transplantation.</p><p>In June 2011, the SLA surface implant was placed.</p><p>No abnormal bone resorption after surgery was observed in the cases. Abnormal findings such as inflammation and swelling have not been observed and the cases are now uneventful. Different implant surface properties were used in two cases, but there was no significant difference between the two cases.</p><p>When the volume of the grafting bone, which is harvested from the oral cavity, is insufficient and a large amount of bone grafting is necessary, iliac bone graft should be very effective.</p>

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top