EMG activity of forearm muscles during maximal and submaximal sustained gripping contraction

DOI Web Site
  • Shimose Ryota
    Department of physiology, Graduate School of Medicine Toho University
  • Tadano Chigaya
    Department of Exercise Physiology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University
  • Yona Masae
    School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Science
  • Sugawara Hitoshi
    Department of physiology, Graduate School of Medicine Toho University
  • Seki Hiroyuki
    Department of physiology, Graduate School of Medicine Toho University
  • Naito Yuko
    Department of Sport and Medical Science, Faculty of Physical Education, Kokushikan University
  • Muro Masuo
    Department of Exercise Physiology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University

Search this article

Description

<p>  Many forearm muscles are responsible for producing a gripping force and the interaction of EMG activity in forearm muscles is unclear during gripping. The purpose of this study was to investigate the change in EMG activity in forearm muscles during sustained gripping. Six subjects participated in this study. They performed sustained gripping with their dominant hand at 50% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and MVC without restriction of the wrist (maximum one minute). Gripping force and EMG (flexor carpi ulnaris [FCU], flexor digitorum superficialis [FDS], and extensor carpi radialis [ECR]) were measured simultaneously and average gripping force, root mean square EMG (rmsEMG) and mean power frequency (MPF) every five seconds were calculated. The relationship between contraction time and EMG responses (coefficient) were investigated. Fatigue was defined as a 5% decline in gripping force from the target level during 50% MVC. In 50% MVC protocol, there was no difference in the coefficient of rmsEMG among the three muscles. But, the coefficient of MPF was different and decreasing MPF in ECR tended to be smaller than in FCU. Only the coefficient of MPF in ECR tended to correlate with time to fatigue. In MVC protocol, the coefficient of rmsEMG was different and a decreasing rmsEMG in ECR tended to be larger than in FDS. There was no difference in the coefficient of MPF among the three muscles. These results suggest that neural drive to ECR is larger during gripping. Therefore, we conclude that EMG activity of ECR plays an important role in gripping.</p>

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top