- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Cervical disc degeneration evaluated by MRI -Comparison of lumbar and cervical classifications-
-
- Otaki Haruka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine
-
- Otani Koji
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine
-
- Sekiguchi Miho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine
-
- Konno Shin-ichi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- MRIによる頚椎椎間板変性の評価―腰椎と頚椎の分類法の比較―
Search this article
Description
<p>Introduction: Pfirmann and Schneiderman classifications are mainly used to evaluate lumbar disc degenerations, however, there is no established classification method of disc degeneration for the cervical spine. The purpose of this study was to assess whether lumbar disc degeneration classifications can be used to evaluate cervical disc degeneration.</p><p>Methods: The subjects were 547 persons who underwent cervical spine MRI. Two lumbar disc degeneration classifications (Pfirmann and Schneiderman classifications) and five cervical disc degeneration classifications (Matsumoto's, Miyazaki's, Nakashima's, Jacobs', and Suzuki's classifications) were used to evaluate C2/3 to C7/T1 disc degeneration based on T2 weighted images with a mid-sagittal view. The relationship between the grade of each classification and age was examined using Spearman's correlation coefficient. The distribution of grades by intervertebral disc level was also assessed.</p><p>Results: In all classifications, age and grade were moderately correlated (0.412-0.547). The most severe intervertebral disc degeneration level was determined to be C5/6 based on all classifications.</p><p>Conclusions: In this study, there were no differences between the lumbar and cervical disc degeneration classifications. We concluded that cervical disc degeneration could be evaluated by lumbar disc degeneration classification.</p>
Journal
-
- Journal of Spine Research
-
Journal of Spine Research 11 (6), 890-896, 2020-06-20
The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390285300166972928
-
- NII Article ID
- 130007858260
-
- ISSN
- 24351563
- 18847137
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed