明曠刪補『天台菩薩戒疏』における律儀戒――『大智度論』の十種戒を中心に――

DOI Web Site Web Site 参考文献1件

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • The Disciplinary Precepts in the<i> Tiantai pusajie shu</i> 天台菩薩戒疏 by Mingkuang 明曠: Beginning from the Discussion on the Recognition of the Ten Types of Precepts from the <i>Da zhidu lun</i> 大智度論
  • メイコウサンホ 『 テンダイ ボサツ カイソ 』 ニ オケル リチギ カイ : 『 タイチドロン 』 ノ ジッシュ カイ オ チュウシン ニ

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p>Mingkuang 明曠 states that his Tiantai pusajie shu 天台菩薩戒疏 is based on Zhiyi’s 智顗 works. Most scholars of Mingkuang have pointed out that Mingkuang’s perspective on the precepts affects Saicho’s 最澄 concept that “Hīnayāna” precepts should be abandoned. Both Zhiyi and Mingkuang refer to the ten types of precepts 十種戒 from the Da zhidu lun 大智度論. Zhiyi categorized the first three precepts of the ten types as the disciplinary precepts 律儀戒, considering them as “Hīnayāna” precepts. On the other hand, Mingkuang defines the disciplinary precepts as those of the Mahāyāna Fanwang jing 梵網経. This difference in their understandings of the disciplinary precepts could lead to the idea that Mingkuang abandoned the “Hīnayāna” disciplinary precepts. However, the difference actually arises due to their unique approaches to the ten types of the precepts. Throughout the Tiantai pusajie shu, Mingkuang recognizes that “Hīnayāna” precepts are also Mahāyāna Bodhi­sattva precepts, stating that practitioners should uphold both precepts of “Hīnayāna” and Mahāyāna equally. His thinking is close to that of his mentor, Zhanran 湛然.</p>

収録刊行物

参考文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ