Hōnen’s Position on the Possibility of <i>Ōjō</i> through Practices Other than the <i>Nembutsu</i>: “I Do Not Absolutely Deny the Possibility of <i>Ōjō </i>by Other Means”

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 法然における諸行往生の可否――「ふつとむまれずといふにはあらず」――
  • ホウネン ニ オケル ショギョウ オウジョウ ノ カヒ : フツトム マレズ ト イフ ニワ アラズ

Search this article

Description

<p>This paper is a part of a series of articles on the question whether Hōnen acknowledged in theory the possibility of ōjō (birth in the Pure Land) through practices other than the nembutsu. After a decade-long study based on texts written in Classical Chinese (kanbun) such as the Senchaku Hongan Nembutsu shū, the author has come to the final conclusion that Hōnen, although highly reservedly, admitted the possibility of ōjō through miscellaneous practices. The first half of this paper gives an overview of the study. In the latter part of the paper, it will be shown that an examination of texts written in Japanese (wago) has led the author to the same conclusion.</p>

Journal

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top