-
- Lee Dongsun
- 東京大学
この論文をさがす
説明
<p>This paper proposes that the English conformist views of the nature of episcopacy is best indicated by focusing on their differing interpretation of Jeromeʼs two specific writings. Previous literature assumed a hardening case of jure divino argument and fell short of establishing an adequate method of comparing the conformist opinions of episcopacy. Providing a better frame of comparison, it is demonstrated that there were three types of conformist responses and that the typology did not become starker in a chronological manner.</p>
収録刊行物
-
- イギリス哲学研究
-
イギリス哲学研究 43 (0), 23-39, 2020-03-20
日本イギリス哲学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390287706351518080
-
- NII論文ID
- 130008026065
-
- NII書誌ID
- AN00013859
-
- ISSN
- 24334731
- 03877450
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 030355543
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDLサーチ
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可