大切なのはLSCの経験値か, ロボット手術の経験値か　～ RSC導入で感じたこと～

DOI
  • 渡邊 昌太郎
    東邦大学医療センター大橋病院　泌尿器科学講座 済生会横浜市東部病院　泌尿器科
  • 小杉 道男
    済生会横浜市東部病院　泌尿器科

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Which is more important to do Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy? : Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy experience or Robot surgical skills

この論文をさがす

説明

<p>  In Japan, robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) has been covered by medical insurance since April 2020. Not only in Europe and the United States, but also in Asian countries, the technical and clinical evidence of RSC has been accumulating. RSC can be easily performed with sutures and ligatures even in the deep pelvic floor. Because of plenty suturing procedure in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC), the learning curve of RSC is shorter than that of LSC. As robot-assisted surgery becomes more popular and experienced, RSC is expected to make the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) more accessible.</p><p>  On the other hand, the broad knowledge and experience of female urologist will strengthen the quality of the surgery. Both robotic surgical skills and LSC experience must be important to RSC and bringing benefits for POP patients.</p>

収録刊行物

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390290239006575232
  • NII論文ID
    130008123978
  • DOI
    10.11302/jsejje.34.226
  • ISSN
    21874700
    21861889
  • 本文言語コード
    ja
  • データソース種別
    • JaLC
    • CiNii Articles
  • 抄録ライセンスフラグ
    使用不可

問題の指摘

ページトップへ