Beyond the European Community Treaty Provisions : A Need To Question the Cassis de Dijon Rule of Reason in Wouters?

DOI HANDLE Web Site オープンアクセス
  • Van Uytsel Steven
    Faculty of Law, Kyushu University : Assistant Professor : Competition Law, Intenational Trade Law, Law and Culture

この論文をさがす

抄録

Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION

Ⅱ. THE CASSIS DE DIJON RULE OF REASON OUTSIDE THE FREE MOVEMENT JURISPRUDENCE

A. A Reference to Reisebüro in Wouters

B. Meca-Medina Confirms Wouters

C. The Importance of Wouters' Confirmation in Meca-Medina

Ⅲ. CASSIS DE DIJON LINKED WITH WOUTERS VIA THE RULE OF REASON

A. Free Movement of Goods Jurisprudence Guiding the Interpretation

B. Dassonville as a Seedbed for Cassis de Dijon

C. Cassis de Dijon, Beyond Discrimination

D. The Rule of Reason in Cassis de Dijon

E. Cassis de Dijon and Wouters, Structural Similarity

Ⅳ. THE RULE OF REASON JUSTIFIED

A. The Rule of Reason within the Free Movement Jurisprudence

1. Extending the Prohibitions' Scope of Application

2. The Limited Scope of Exceptions

3. Positioning the Rule of Reason: Article 28 EC or Article 30 EC?

B. Free Movement Jurisprudence within Article 81(1) EC Necessary?

2. Article 81 EC, Prohibitions and Exceptions

2. Article 81(3) EC and Public Interest Considerations

3. Wouters and Meca-Medina under Article 81(3) EC?

4. Making Sense out of Wouters and Meca-Medina

Ⅴ. CONCLUSION

収録刊行物

  • 法政研究

    法政研究 76 (43832), 1-44, 2009-10-01

    九州大学法政学会

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ