Evaluation of capacity for sample processing of the automated coagulation analyzer STACIA CN10

DOI Web Site
  • OIKAWA Mai
    Division of Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital
  • KONDO Takashi
    Division of Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital
  • NAKAFURI Hirotaka
    Division of Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital
  • MORIAI Ryosuke
    Division of Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital
  • NARUMI Natsuki
    Division of Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital
  • ENDOH Akemi
    Division of Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital
  • ASANUMA Koichi
    Division of Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital
  • TAKAHASHI Satoshi
    Division of Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital Department of Infection Control and Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 全自動血液凝固検査システムSTACIA CN10の検体処理能力の評価
  • ゼン ジドウ ケツエキ ギョウコ ケンサ システム STACIA CN10 ノ ケンタイ ショリ ノウリョク ノ ヒョウカ

Search this article

Abstract

<p>Coagulation tests using an automated analyzer are popular, but sample processing capacity could decrease when multiple items with different measurement principles are simultaneously measured. Recently, the automated coagulation analyzer “STACIA CN10” has been developed. STACIA CN10 shows improved sample processing capacity through the use of a measuring table independent of each measurement principle. Therefore, we evaluated the sample processing capacity of STACIA CN10. The total assay time for 50 samples was 62 min 58 s with STACIA CN10, which was about 20 min shorter than that (82 min 59 s) with CS-5100. On the other hand, the assay time of each sample was about 3 min 30 s longer on average than that with CS-5100. Therefore, we investigated the sampling interval of both analyzers, and the results showed that the sampling interval of STACIA CN10 was about 30 s shorter on average than that of CS-5100. From these results, it is considered that STACIA CN10 shortened the sampling interval independent of the measuring table and improved the sample processing capacity in the case of continuous measurements of multiple items. STACIA CN10 has better sample processing capacity than CS-5100 and is considered to be useful for routine examinations.</p>

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top