有識者参加型WSを評価する視点の提案

DOI

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Evaluation items for an expert-participatory workshop

抄録

The workshop method is expected to derive more opinions and ideas than the strictly planned and operated meetings. Previously, the authors have proposed a method and organized experimental sessions with intellectuals. This paper introduces four evaluation criteria for these workshops from two perspectives. For process evaluation, the criteria are vibrant conversation, fusing opinions, and generating team-specific ideas, and for output evaluation, diversity in ideas. We applied the criteria to the records of an experimental workshop and proved that the method improved the quality of outputs generated by the discussion participants.

収録刊行物

詳細情報 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390294496035718016
  • DOI
    10.57324/hokkaidourbanstudies.59.0_9
  • ISSN
    24367060
    13433261
  • 本文言語コード
    ja
  • データソース種別
    • JaLC
  • 抄録ライセンスフラグ
    使用不可

問題の指摘

ページトップへ