Comparison of deodorization and venting among five stoma pouches with filter

DOI

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • ストーマ袋に使用されている脱臭フィルターの脱臭性とガス通過性の比較

Search this article

Description

<p>　We evaluated of stoma pouches with a filter to investigate the satisfaction of filter performance（air venting and deodorization）by interviewing 55 ostomates and also by laboratory testing. Subjects（29.1％）said they were concerned with odor leakage. The reasons are related to leakage from the filter a itself, clogged filter, the length of the post-operative period and the type of stoma. Also, 81.8％ of subjects answered that the filter did not have proper air venting.<br>　We evaluated five different types of pouches with a deodorizing filter and venting capacity using hydrogen sulfide（H2S）and methylmercaptan as the odor model. Four out of 5 pouches（Coloplast, ConvaTec, Hollister and Dansac）showed similar deodorizing capacity. The venting capacity ranking was ConvaTec, Alcare, Hollister,　Dansac and Coloplast.<br>　As a result of the interview, 83.6% of ostomates were not satisfied with the existing product with a filter and required a stoma pouch that can effectively vent and deodorize odor.<br>　Filters have two different requirements, deodorization and venting, although these are inverse functions.</p>

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390294894500308736
  • DOI
    10.32201/jpnwocm.10.2_22
  • ISSN
    18842321
    1884233X
  • Text Lang
    ja
  • Data Source
    • JaLC
  • Abstract License Flag
    Disallowed

Report a problem

Back to top