Monitoring and Advice for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy:

DOI

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 科学技術政策におけるモニタリングとアドバイス
  • Trial-and-Error Lessons from France for Better Policy Evaluation
  • －フランスの試行錯誤を踏まえた評価の改善策－

Abstract

<p>  This paper aimed to examine how to achieve better policy evaluation regarding science, technology, and innovation (STI) considering the case of France. The paper consists of three parts, as presented below: (1) President Charles de Gaulle firstly set up an advisory body in his administration to monitor the STI policy and advise decision-makers. The policy evaluation system was established in the 1980s under a new left party government. (2) There were some trials and errors until the 1990s to make policy evaluations more robust and credible by using bottom-up, redundant, and proactive monitoring, and considering the interaction between the evaluation and the resource management of researchers and research units. (3) With a need for a national STI policy strategy development, what followed was the establishment of an integrated evaluation body (Le Haut Conseil de l’évaluation de la recherche et de l’enseignement supérieur) and a supervising body (Le Conseil stratégique de la recherche). In conclusion, policy evaluation can be improved through an integrated discussion on the aim (i.e. economic impact assessment), processes (i.e. linkage with government funding), and institutional placement (i.e. independence) of monitoring and advice (i.e. organisations).</p>

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390296288051278336
  • DOI
    10.11278/jjoes.21.1_71
  • ISSN
    18847161
    13466151
  • Text Lang
    ja
  • Data Source
    • JaLC
  • Abstract License Flag
    Disallowed

Report a problem

Back to top