Is the Sacral Pedicle Screw Adequate as the Distal Anchor in Multi-level Fixation of the Lumbosacral Spine with Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

DOI
  • Yasukawa Taiki
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Shirahata Toshiyuki
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Asakura Tomoya
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital
  • Kudo Yoshifumi
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Maruyama Hiroshi
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Yamamura Ryo
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Hayakawa Chikara
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Tsuchiya Koki
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Ishikawa Koji
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Toyone Tomoaki
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Inagaki Katsunori
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • LLIFを用いた腰仙椎多椎間固定において仙骨椎弓根スクリューは最尾側アンカーとして弱いのか?

Search this article

Description

<p>Introduction: We have employed the sacral pedicle screw (S1PS) as the distal anchor in multi-level fixation of the lumbosacral spine combined with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). However, S1PS loosening has been frequent. The present study aims to investigate the loosening of S1PS, cage subsidence, and fusion rate in multi-level lumbosacral fixation combined with LLIF.</p><p>Methods: We evaluated fourteen patients diagnosed with lumbar canal stenosis and degenerative scoliosis who underwent multi-level lumbosacral fixation with LLIF. CT images were used to evaluate radiological findings, including radiolucent zones around sacral screws, cage subsidence, loss of correction in lumbosacral lordosis, and bone fusion at L5/S postoperative 1 year.</p><p>Results: S1PS loosening was confirmed in 9 cases (9/14, 64%) at 3 months postoperatively, and in 13 cases (13/14, 92%) at 6 months postoperatively. The mean correction loss of lordosis at L5/S was 4.3° at 1 year postoperatively, and cage subsidence was observed in 10 cases (10/14, 71%). Bone fusion at L5/S was achieved in only 7 cases (7/14, 50%) at 1 year postoperatively. In the cases with no loosening of S1PS, the mean sacral Hounsfield unit was relatively high (215.3, Mean: 149.4), and both S1PS were inserted using a bicortical trajectory. In cases where both S1PS were inserted using a monocortical trajectory, a successful fusion of L5/S was only achieved in one out of six cases (16.6%).</p><p>Conclusions: S1PS loosening occurred in 91% of the patients. Patients with multi-level lumbosacral fixation combined with LLIF have a high risk of S1PS loosening when used as the most distal anchor.</p>

Journal

  • Journal of Spine Research

    Journal of Spine Research 14 (10), 1283-1291, 2023-10-20

    The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top