The Relationship between Self-estimated Value and Landing Error in Single Leg Hop for Distance: A Study in Healthy Adults

DOI
  • Shimamoto D
    Department of Rehabilitation, Nishinomiya Kaisei Hospital
  • Kamiike K
    Department of Rehabilitation, Nishinomiya Kaisei Hospital
  • Onishi S
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nishinomiya Kaisei Hospital
  • Morooka T
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nishinomiya Kaisei Hospital
  • Yoshiya S
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nishinomiya Kaisei Hospital

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • SingleLegHopforDistance における見積もり値と着地可否の関係:健常成人での検討

Abstract

<p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between self-estimated values and landing errors in the single leg hop for distance (SHD). Self-estimated values and hop distance were measured for 63 healthy adults. The participants were classified into two groups: those who were able to achieve a stable landing (group A), and those who were not (group B). In addition to the self-estimated values, knee flexion and extension muscle strength, age, height, and weight were included in the analysis as factors that may potentially affect postural stability during landing. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, independent ttest, logistic regression analysis, and ROC analysis. The significance level was set at 5%. The results showed that the mean self-estimated value (standardized by height) was significantly higher for group B (102.8±19.0) compared to the corresponding value for group A (74.4±16.8). Of the potentially influential factors, the only one identified as a predictor of landing stability was the self-estimated value, with a cut-off value of 87.1%. If the SHD selfestimated value exceeds 87.1%, a landing error may occur.</p>

Journal

Details 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390300003467065088
  • DOI
    10.57474/jjcsm.32.1_57
  • ISSN
    27583767
    13464159
  • Text Lang
    ja
  • Data Source
    • JaLC
  • Abstract License Flag
    Allowed

Report a problem

Back to top