[Updated on Apr. 18] Integration of CiNii Articles into CiNii Research

THE PERFORMANCE OF RANDOMIZATION METHODS IN CONSIDERATION OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR SMALL-SIZE CLINICAL TRIALS: A SIMULATION STUDY

DOI Web Site 17 References Open Access
  • Takahashi Kanae
    Department of Medical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University
  • Yamamoto Kouji
    Department of Medical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University

Search this article

Abstract

<p>The performance of randomization methods in consideration of the impact of a prognostic factor that has an interaction and baseline characteristics that have no effect on the outcome has not been clarified, especially for small sized clinical trials. We conducted numerical simulations to identify the difference in behaviour of the empirical power and the empirical type 1 error rate among some randomization methods and statistical analyses when we use a prognostic factor that has an interaction or baseline characteristics that have no effect on the outcome for small sized randomized controlled trials. The empirical power was higher when using a prognostic factor that had an interaction. Also, by using stratified blocked randomization (ST) or minimization (MI) with the multiple regression, the empirical power was further increased. On the other hand, the empirical power was lower when using baseline characteristics that had no effect on the outcome. We recommend conducting ST or MI, multiple regression and using a prognostic factor that has an interaction in small-size randomized controlled trials.</p>

Journal

Citations (0)*help

See more

References(17)*help

See more

Related Articles

See more

Related Data

See more

Related Books

See more

Related Dissertations

See more

Related Projects

See more

Related Products

See more

Details

Report a problem

Back to top