戦後教育改革期の指導要録における「教育評価」機能の検討

DOI Web Site オープンアクセス

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Study of the “Educational Evaluation” Function in Student Permanent Records during the Period of Postwar Education Reform: A Focus on the “Cumulative Record Summary” (1949)
  • 戦後教育改革期の指導要録における「教育評価」機能の検討 : 「累加記録摘要」(1949)を中心に
  • センゴ キョウイク カイカクキ ノ シドウ ヨウロク ニ オケル 「 キョウイク ヒョウカ 」 キノウ ノ ケントウ : 「 ルイカ キロク テキヨウ 」(1949)オ チュウシン ニ
  • ―「累加記録摘要」（1949）を中心に―

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p>　Based on the history of the “cumulative record summary” created by the Ministry of Education in 1949 (Showa 24) and the subsequent revision to the student permanent record, this paper seeks to clarify the function of the “educational evaluation” component of student permanent record documents expected to be used by secondary schools during the post–World War II education reforms.</p><p>　The “cumulative record summary” served as a “record for teaching” meant to improve teaching methods and curriculum content based on daily teaching activities.</p><p>　The subsequent revision to the “student permanent record” in 1955 (Showa 30) added the role of “externally validated record,” for use as data to inform future study and employment activities.</p><p>　The Ministry of Education explained that the “student permanent record” had a “dual character” indicative of the document’s two functions as a “record for teaching” and “externally validated record.” However, the record has since undergone major revisions since its inception as the “cumulative record summary.”</p><p>　Accordingly, this paper will consider the nature of the “cumulative record summary,” the reactions of educational institutions that used this document, the background to the revisions to the “student permanent record” at the Ministry of Education, and the “dual character” of this document.</p><p>　As a result, in addition to clarifying the “educational evaluation” function of the “cumulative record summary,” we conclude that the function of the “student permanent record” as a “record for teaching” does not have substance sufficient to be characterized as having a “dual character” from the viewpoint of enhancing “educational evaluation.”</p>

収録刊行物

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ