Comparison Between Holistic and Analytic Rubrics of a Paired Oral Test
-
- KOIZUMI Rie
- Juntendo University
-
- IN’NAMI Yo
- Chuo University
-
- FUKAZAWA Makoto
- University of the Ryukyus
この論文をさがす
説明
<p>The current study aimed to reveal similarities and differences between a holistic and an analytic rubric used in assessing speaking performance in a paired oral test. To this end, speaking performances of 110 Japanese university students produced in paired oral interaction were evaluated by raters, holistically and analytically. The comparisons made between the two rubrics using many-facet Rasch measurement showed that both worked effectively, with the analytic rubric working slightly better in terms of a better global fit, a better test-taker and task separation, higher test-taker and task reliability, smaller standard errors, and a smaller percentage of test takers with overfit. Correlation and regression analysis indicated a strong relationship between the two (r = .84) and the Interactive communication and Fluency analytic criteria substantially explained holistic scores (adjusted R2 = .71). Results suggest that teachers can obtain similar results with either rubric type and, if they select an analytic one, a priority would be to include Interactive communication and Fluency criteria.</p>
収録刊行物
-
- 日本言語テスト学会誌
-
日本言語テスト学会誌 23 (0), 57-77, 2020
日本言語テスト学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390570000439351680
-
- NII論文ID
- 130008057483
-
- NII書誌ID
- AA12587252
-
- ISSN
- 21899746
- 21895341
-
- HANDLE
- 20.500.12000/0002019546
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 031294136
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- 資料種別
- journal article
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- IRDB
- NDLサーチ
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
- OpenAIRE
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可