Sāṃkhya Theory in the<i> Prajñāpradīpa-ṭīkā</i> chp. 9

DOI Web Site Web Site

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 『般若灯論復注』第9章におけるサーンキヤ説考察
  • 『般若灯論複注』第9章におけるサーンキヤ説考察
  • 『 ハンニャトウロンフクチュウ 』 ダイ9ショウ ニ オケル サーンキヤセツ コウサツ

Search this article

Abstract

<p>The subject of criticism of Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (MMK) chp. 9, when it criticizes A preceding subject existing prior to whole sensory organs, is known to be the Pudgalavādins in general, but is not specified in the MMK.</p><p>However, the Buddhapālita-mūlamadhyamaka-vṛtti (BP), an important commentary of a somewhat later time, did not specify the subject of criticism of chp. 9, criticizing A preceding subject by a parable of the window.</p><p>Since then, the Prajñāpradīpa (PP) has clarified that the subject of the BP is the Sāṃkhya school, and the Prajñāpradīpa-ṭīkā (PPṬ) succeeded to the commentary on the PP to introduce the Sāṃkhya theory in more detail.</p><p>However, the PPṬ commented on the subject of criticism of the BP as rather Sāṃkhya theory, while the Pudgalavādin is also presented as a subject of criticism of chp. 9.</p><p>Therefore, it is necessary to consider the differences between the commentaries in more detail in order to clarify the subject of criticism in chapter 9 of the MMK.</p>

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top