<Notes>On the notes of "Shikimoku"

DOI HANDLE Web Site Open Access

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • <研究ノート>式目註釈書について
  • 式目註釈書について
  • シキモク チュウシャクショ ニ ツイテ

Search this article

Abstract

The present paper deals with the writer's informations on the systematic arrangement and bibliography due to some references, which were researched during editing the history of law in the middle age of Japan, vol. 1 (law of the "Kamakura" Shogunate), no. 2 (compilation of supplementary law). Why did the annotation of "Shikimoku" become popular from the last period of "Muromachi" when "Shikimoku" lost its effect as an active law? Why did the way of annotation not always belong to so-called" the history of law" but an exegetics like Chinese classics? How many lineages were there among "Shikimoku" annotators? Why did only "Seike" lineage develop after other lineages, "Iio" and "Saitô", had declined? This seems to depended upon the method of family study of "Seike". The writer is very sorry to find that the present paper has many logical errors, so he hopes some advancement in the present paper through guidances of readers.

Journal

  • 史林

    史林 46 (5), 837-857, 1963-09-01

    THE SHIGAKU KENKYUKAI (The Society of Historical Research), Kyoto University

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top