Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- ヒョウメンテキ チュウリツ セイサク ト ベツイテキ コウカ : ニンシン ジョセイ エ ノ サベツ オ レイ ニ
Search this article
Abstract
This article analyzes pregnancy discrimination, including the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. case. The article explains the disparate treatment theory for pregnant women, the court's decisions, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidance, and the legislative history of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. It concludes that the disparate impact theory can mandate employers to provide accommodations to women affected by pregnancy.
Journal
-
- 経済理論
-
経済理論 387 63-79, 2017-03-01
[出版社不明]
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390572174820356224
-
- NII Article ID
- 120006030902
-
- NII Book ID
- AN00071425
-
- ISSN
- 04516222
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 028037565
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- IRDB
- NDL
- CiNii Articles