Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- Clarissaにおける発話の表出について ―Pamelaと比較して―
- Clarissa ニ オケル ハツワ ノ ヒョウシュツ ニ ツイテ Pamela ト ヒカク シテ
Search this article
Abstract
Samuel Richardson firmly believed that "the narrative in the form of correspondence" would give a stronger and more vivid impression than what he describes as "the dry, narrative, unanimated Style" in his Preface to Clarissa. Although his Pamela and Clarissa are both written in the epistolary form, there are considerable differences found in his stylistic features between these two, particularly in terms of speech presentation and the use of reporting verbs. The purpose of this article is to explore linguistically his innovative devices for presenting speeches in Clarissa in comparison with Pamela. Our concern here is not with the extensive varieties of speech presentation, but with those which serve to demonstrate the author's creative skills.
Journal
-
- 岡山大学大学院教育学研究科研究集録
-
岡山大学大学院教育学研究科研究集録 142 39-48, 2009-10-21
岡山大学大学院教育学研究科
- Tweet
Keywords
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390572175347233152
-
- NII Article ID
- 120002306715
- 40016928774
-
- NII Book ID
- AA12338258
-
- ISSN
- 18832423
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 10516664
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- IRDB
- NDL
- CiNii Articles