The Current Discussion on the so-called Deuteronomistic History: Literary Criticism and Theological Consequences

DOI 機関リポジトリ Web Site

この論文をさがす

説明

This article deals with the current debate about the so-called “Deuteronomistic History” (DtrH). It presents the different positions in Old Testament scholarship and argues for a model that takes into account as many observations as possible brought forward by the tenants of different positions. An analysis of Deut 12 shows that there is indeed evidence that one should distinguish in the dtr edition of the books from Deuteronomy to Kings three main layers and eras: a first dtr edition in the 7th century BCE, a second revision dealing with the problems of the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem during the 6th century and a last revision in the first half of the Persian period in a segregationist perspective. This threefold edition can also be detected in three different conclusions of the DtrH. When Deuteronomy was cut off from the following books in order to become the conclusion of the Pentateuch, it underwent a redaction that emphasizes its function as the last book of the Torah.

収録刊行物

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ