Comparative Narrative as Secondary Analysis : Reconsidering the “Hachinosu Castle” Dispute

DOI IR (HANDLE) Open Access

Search this article

Description

Focusing on P. Abell’s comparative narratives as a standard analytical method for which there is an abundance of qualitative data in recent years, this paper will review its general properties and issues and then consider its meaning, particularly in secondary analysis of qualitative data. As a case study, it will consider the initial stage of the so-called “Hachinosu Castle” dispute in opposition to the construction of Shimouke and Matsubara dams in Kyushu, Japan. First, through interactive mode abstraction we will identify the key phases in the dispute process. Then, we will explore the issue using a semantic approach that expands on Abell's local explanation, centered on these key phases, to consider how gaps among the parties in their intents and their understandings thereof impacted the course of the dispute. The aim is to position the method of comparative narratives in secondary analysis within an analytical framework of semantic exploration ⇔ abstraction ⇔ generalization, to make it more effective.

Journal

  • 地球社会統合科学

    地球社会統合科学 29 (1), 15-37, 2022-09-15

    Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Global Society, Kyushu University

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390574876232619904
  • NII Book ID
    AA12709917
  • DOI
    10.15017/4797994
  • ISSN
    24332453
    21894043
  • HANDLE
    2324/4797994
  • Text Lang
    en
  • Article Type
    departmental bulletin paper
  • Data Source
    • JaLC
    • IRDB
  • Abstract License Flag
    Allowed

Report a problem

Back to top