分析形而上学と経験科学の連続主義に対する批判的検討

DOI Web Site 参考文献17件 オープンアクセス

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • A Critical Examination of the View that Analytic Metaphysics and Empirical Sciences Are Methodologically Continuous:
  • Is Metaphysics Modeling?
  • ―形而上学はモデリングか？―

説明

<p>    One of the pressing issues in the methodology of metaphysics is the relationship between (analytic) metaphysics and empirical science. In her recent paper, L.A. Paul has defended the methodological continuity of metaphysics and empirical sciences. According to her account, metaphysics and empirical science have distinct subject matters, but share the same methodology. More specifically, she argues that both metaphysical theorizing and scientific theorizing can be understood as model-building. In this article, I critically examine her argument and point out some non-negligible problems with the view that metaphysical theorizing is modeling.</p>

収録刊行物

  • 科学哲学

    科学哲学 56 (1), 59-, 2023-11-15

    日本科学哲学会

参考文献 (17)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ