Validation of attainment target defined by the curriculum for clinical neurophysiology training in Japan

DOI
  • Jin Kazutaka
    Department of Epileptology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
  • Uematsu Akikazu
    Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Matsumoto Medical Center/Department of Health Science, Faculty of Sports and Health Science, Daito Bunka University
  • Uchiyama Makoto
    Department of Psychiatry, Nihon University School of Medicine
  • Kawai Kensuke
    Department of Neurosurgery, Jichi Medical University
  • Kawabata Shigenori
    Department of Advanced Technology in Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
  • Kobayashi Katsuhiro
    Department of Child Neurology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • Sakata Ayumi
    Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital
  • Takahashi Osamu
    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine/Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Rehabilitation Hospital
  • Naito Yutaka
    Department of Neurology, Japanese Red Cross Ise Hospital
  • Hanajima Ritsuko
    Division of Neurology, Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University
  • Fujiwara Toshiyuki
    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine
  • Yabe Hirooki
    Department of Neuropsychiatry, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine
  • Sonoo Masahiro
    Faculty of Medical Technology, Teikyo University/Department of Neurology, Teikyo University School of Medicine

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 臨床神経生理研修カリキュラムが定める到達目標グレードの妥当性の検討
  • Questionnaire survey and process to finalize the curriculum
  • アンケート調査およびカリキュラム確定に至る過程

Abstract

<p>Japanese Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (JSCN) operates board certifications for clinical neurophysiologist and clinical neurophysiology technologist, both for the electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography/nerve conduction (EMG/NCS) sections, respectively. The specialty committee of JSCN proposed the curriculum for clinical neurophysiology training that defined attainment targets regarding knowledge and skills in 2017. The curriculum was composed of the common (basic) section, EEG section, and EMG/NCS section. To test its validity, we conducted questionnaire survey asking board-certified clinical neurophysiologists (medical doctors) and clinical neurophysiology technologists (mostly clinical laboratory technicians) about the appropriateness of the grade regarding the attainment of individual items of the curriculum. As results, 70 answers from doctors and 61 answers from technologists were obtained. In general, the dissociation between the grade proposed by the committee and that considered appropriate through the questionnaire was larger for the curriculum for technologists in EEG and EMG/NCS sections, but was larger for that for medical doctors in the basic section. When less than 50% of answers agreed with the grade proposed by the committee, the grading was reconsidered. This occurred for six items in the curriculum for technologists. Finally, the grade was changed for four out of the six items, 2 for the EEG section and 2 for the EMG/NCS section. These included indication for EEG, EEG changes by vigilance or aging, indication for NCS, and indication for repetitive nerve stimulation. For all 4 items, the grade was raised from grade B (can explain the outline) to grade A (can explain the full details). No change was made to the curriculum for medical doctors. Consequently, “the curriculum for clinical neurophysiology training” was finalized and approved by the executive board of JSCN in 2020. The established curriculum was open on the JSCN website, and is being required as the eligibility for the admission to the board-examination for medical doctors from 2024. The curriculum for specialty training is usually determined by members in a pertinent committee of a society. We aimed to validate it through an extensive questionnaire to board-certified doctors and technologists. As far as we searched, we could not find similar attempts, at least in Japan. Such a method would be useful for increasing the reliability of the curriculum that would meet the requirement for the national health.</p>

Journal

Details 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390581246237753728
  • DOI
    10.11422/jscn.52.95
  • ISSN
    2188031X
    13457101
  • Text Lang
    ja
  • Data Source
    • JaLC
  • Abstract License Flag
    Disallowed

Report a problem

Back to top