Biological Differences between <i>Chromodoris reticulata</i> and <i>Chromodoris tinctoria</i> (Opisthobranchia: Nudibranchia)

DOI Web Site
  • Sekizawa Ayami
    Department of Biology and Geosciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University
  • Yama Ritsuno
    Department of Marine Science and Resources, College of Bioresource, Sciences, Nihon University
  • Nakashima Yasuhiro
    College of Economics, Nihon University

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • チリメンウミウシとサラサウミウシのさまざまな生物学的相違
  • Biological Differences between Chromodoris reticulata and Chromodoris tinctoria (Opisthobranchia: Nudibranchia)

Search this article

Description

<p>The shape and formation of the radula have traditionally been regarded as important characteristics in classifying nudibranchs. However, we cannot use radular information to aid in the classification of living specimens, because a radula cannot be examined unless dissected. In contrast, the reliability of mantle color patterns as a characteristic for species identification has been open to debate because of the wide variations observed among individuals. When we compared various characteristics of Chromodoris reticulata and Chromodoris tinctoria (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia), which have similar color patterns and are sometimes confused with each other, we found considerable differences in the overall body shape, in external and internal morphologies such as the rhinophores and secondary gill, shape of the spines on the surface of the penis, formation style of the embryos and egg capsules, and in mating behavior. A consistent relationship was observed between these characteristics and the color pattern of the mantle. During crossing experiments, although members of the two species tried to mate, they stopped copulation before inserting their penes. Our results support the theory that mantle color pattern is a reliable characteristic for identification of at least some nudibranchs and is applicable to ecological studies.</p>

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top