Comparison of Spatial Pattern and Mechanism between Convexity and Gap Winds

DOI IR IR (HANDLE) Web Site 3 Citations 20 References Open Access
  • Nishi Akifumi
    Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba
  • Kusaka Hiroyuki
    Center for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba

Search this article

Description

<p>This study uses a numerical model to examine how a convex feature and a gap feature in a mountain range affect the leeward wind field. In the “convexity case”, the mountain ridge has a convex feature (viewed from above). In the “gap case”, the mountain ridge has a gap. The results show that both cases have local winds at the surface exceeding 8 m s−1, and both have similar spatial flow-patterns. However, the momentum budgets at the strong-wind regions differ between the cases. In the convexity case, the downdrafts are important in the momentum balance, whereas in the gap case, both the downdrafts and the pressure-gradient force are important. Thus, although their spatial patterns of surface wind are similar to each other, their mechanisms for producing a strong local wind differ.</p><p>Sensitivity experiments of Frm show that strong-wind appears in both the convexity and gap cases when Frm is between 0.42 and 1.04. In contrast, when Frm is 0.21, strong winds only appear in the gap case because the flow can go around the gap. When Frm exceeds 1.25, strong surface winds appear in the entire leeward plain.</p>

Journal

  • SOLA

    SOLA 15 (0), 12-16, 2019

    Meteorological Society of Japan

Citations (3)*help

See more

References(20)*help

See more

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top