環境芸術は自然に対する美的侮辱といえるのか

DOI Web Site オープンアクセス

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Debating Ethical Issues Surrounding Environmental Art
  • 環境芸術は自然に対する美的侮辱といえるのか : 環境芸術をめぐる倫理的問題について
  • カンキョウ ゲイジュツ ワ シゼン ニ タイスル ビテキ ブジョク ト イエル ノ カ : カンキョウ ゲイジュツ オ メグル リンリテキ モンダイ ニ ツイテ
  • On “Is Environmental Art an Aesthetic Affront to Nature?”
  • 環境芸術をめぐる倫理的問題について

この論文をさがす

説明

Environmental Art has often been discussed in the context of recent Anglo-American Environmental Aesthetics. Even though environmental art has developed too many different varieties of forms of expression for a half century to summarize them as an art movement, it is generally known as Land Art and Earthwork, large scale “artwork used natural environment itself as its material”, which emerged in late 1960’s in the USA. Because the earliest examples of Earthwork, especially such as Double Negative by Michael Heizer in 1969-70, excavated by bulldozers and dynamites, they were often criticized for the lack of environmental sensibility. In this paper, I will examine the recent environmental aesthetics’ debates about ethical issues surrounding environmental art, especially on Allen Carlson’s “Is Environmental Art an Aesthetic Affront to Nature?” and the following debates. I clarify that the appreciation of environmental art blurs boundaries between appreciation of nature as nature and that of art as art, and that environmental art expresses the very complicated contemporary natural environment where the dichotomy between nature and art or the natural and the artificial has already been annihilated. I will try to evaluate environmental art both aesthetically and ethically from the viewpoints of artistic and ethical value.

収録刊行物

  • 美学

    美学 69 (1), 49-, 2018

    美学会

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ