- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
-
- Udagawa Atsushi
- 東京大学大学院
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 検索エンジン・ランキングのメディア史
- 検索エンジン・ランキングのメディア史 : パソコン雑誌における検索エンジン表象の分析
- ケンサク エンジン ・ ランキング ノ メディアシ : パソコン ザッシ ニ オケル ケンサク エンジン ヒョウショウ ノ ブンセキ
- a Discourse Analysisof Major PC Magazines
- パソコン雑誌における検索エンジン表象の分析
Search this article
Description
<p>Rankings are ubiquitous forms of media in our daily life. In particular, rankings</p><p>of search engine results are one of the most commonly encountered media.</p><p>However, most users are not aware of how web pages are ranked by search</p><p>engines and even the fact that search engine results are ranked. This means</p><p>search engines are “black-boxes” and rankings as a form of media are</p><p>“obscured”. The purpose of this study is to clarify how this black-box and</p><p>obscured media environment has been constructed by chronologically analyzing</p><p>major personal computer magazines in the United States during the Web1.0</p><p>era. This is a historical analysis of discourses regarding search engine rankings</p><p>and the World Wide Web in general.</p><p>As a result, this study clarifies the following three conclusions. First, the</p><p>World Wide Web was originally considered a plaything, like “web-surfing,”</p><p>before becoming a tool for searching information. Secondly, tools for searching</p><p>webpages changed from semantic directories to computational rankings. Lastly,</p><p>discourse explaining computational technology gradually disappeared as a result</p><p>of a change in the search engine environment from over-competition to monopolization.</p><p> Through this historical process, search engine rankings as media became</p><p>“black-boxes” and implicit trust in the rankings were constructed. Consequently,</p><p>users came to unconsciously consider only the top-ranked contents and rankings</p><p>as a form became obscured. This result suggests that the implicit trust in</p><p>these black-box platforms can potentially amplify “trolling” or “fake news.” The</p><p>study contributes to understanding how digital platforms affect daily communications,</p><p>applying a media studies perspective.</p>
Journal
-
- JOURNAL OF MASS COMMUNICATION STUDIES
-
JOURNAL OF MASS COMMUNICATION STUDIES 94 (0), 131-149, 2019-01-31
Japan Association for Media, Journalism and Communication Studies
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390845713076153984
-
- NII Article ID
- 130007660876
-
- NII Book ID
- AN10418471
-
- ISSN
- 24320838
- 13411306
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 029506630
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Article Type
- journal article
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL Search
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed