- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Automatic Translation feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF COLD VERSUS HOT SNARE POLYPECTOMY FOR RESECTING SMALL COLORECTAL POLYPS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
-
- SHINOZAKI Satoshi
- Shinozaki Medical Clinic. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University.
-
- KOBAYASHI Yasutoshi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University.
-
- HAYASHI Yoshikazu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University.
-
- SAKAMOTO Hirotsugu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University.
-
- KAWARAI LEFOR Alan
- Division of Surgery, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University.
-
- YAMAMOTO Hironori
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University.
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 大腸ポリープに対するコールドスネアポリペクトミーとホットスネアポリペクトミーの有用性と安全性の比較検討:システマティックレビューとメタ解析
Search this article
Description
<p> Background and Aim: Safety and effectiveness of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) compared with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) has been reported. The aim of the present study is to carry out a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of HSP and CSP. </p><p> Methods: Randomized controlled trials were reviewed to compare HSP with CSP for resecting small colorectal polyps. Outcomes reviewed include complete resection rate, polyp retrieval, delayed bleeding, perforation and procedure time. Outcomes were documented by pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the Mantel-Haenszel random effect model.</p><p> Results: Eight studies were reviewed in this meta-analysis, including 1665 patients with 3195 polyps. Complete resection rate using HSP was similar to CSP (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.98-1.07, P = 0.31). Polyp retrieval after HSP was similar to CSP (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01, P = 0.60). Delayed bleeding rate after HSP was higher than after CSP, although not significantly (patient basis: RR: 7.53, 95% CI: 0.94-60.24, P = 0.06; polyp basis: RR: 7.35, 95% CI: 0.91-59.33, P = 0.06). Perforation was not reported in all eight studies. Total colonoscopy time for HSP was significantly longer than CSP (mean difference 7.13 min, 95% CI: 5.32-8.94, P < 0.001). Specific polypectomy time for HSP was significantly longer than CSP (mean difference 30.92 s, 95% CI: 9.15-52.68, P = 0.005). </p><p> Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows significantly shorter procedure time using CSP compared with HSP. CSP tends toward less delayed bleeding compared with HSP. We recommend CSP as the standard treatment for resecting small benign colorectal polyps.</p>
Journal
-
- GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY
-
GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY 61 (6), 1272-1281, 2019
Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390845713078470272
-
- NII Article ID
- 130007665195
-
- ISSN
- 18845738
- 03871207
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed