-
- Hatanaka Tomoka
- Miyazaki Health Evaluation and Promotion Center
-
- Kido Hiromi
- Miyazaki Health Evaluation and Promotion Center
-
- Kawashima Mariko
- Miyazaki Health Evaluation and Promotion Center
-
- Higashikawa Miyuki
- Miyazaki Health Evaluation and Promotion Center
-
- Otsuka Megumi
- Miyazaki Health Evaluation and Promotion Center
-
- Hamada Mitsuko
- Miyazaki Health Evaluation and Promotion Center
-
- Onoue Emiko
- Miyazaki Health Evaluation and Promotion Center
-
- Azakami Kiyoshi
- Miyazaki Health Evaluation and Promotion Center
-
- Miyazaki Masaya
- Miyazaki Health Evaluation and Promotion Center
-
- Taketomi Katsuro
- Miyazaki Health Evaluation and Promotion Center
-
- Nomata Koichiro
- Miyazaki Health Evaluation and Promotion Center
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 特定保健指導開始者増加への取り組み
- 特定保健指導開始者増加への取り組み : スタッフ間で初回面接導入時の説明内容を統一して
- トクテイ ホケン シドウ カイシシャ ゾウカ エ ノ トリクミ : スタッフ カン デ ショカイ メンセツ ドウニュウジ ノ セツメイ ナイヨウ オ トウイツ シテ
- This Trial is to Unify the Content of Explanations at the Time of the First Interview among Staff Members
- ―スタッフ間で初回面接導入時の説明内容を統一して―
Search this article
Description
<p>Objective: We focused on people who did not implement the Specific Health Guidance in order to improve the consultation rate, and it turned out that about 30% of the candidates refused to answer for reasons of “self-management” and “busyness”. We tried to work on the first interview and clarify the effects.</p><p>Methods: During the period of July 2016 to March 2017, 479 candidates for specific health guidance were placed in a control group (2016 group), and 460 persons in an intervention group (2017 group). Unification of explanation methods among staff at the first interview was performed and additional explanations along with a flowchart were given to subjects who refused to adhere to specific health guidance since June 2017. We examined the number of implementers, consultation rate, and the reasons for refusing to adhere to Specific Health Guidance.</p><p>Results: The consultation rate of Specific Health Guidance was 17.9% (86 persons) in the control group and increased by 25.5% (117 persons) in the intervention group. There were two examinees who accepted the consultation after an explanation using the subsequent flowchart was provided.</p><p>Conclusions: This intervention activated the awareness of staff to introduce Specific Health Guidance, and motivated examinees. These interventions may have contributed to an increase in the rate of initiation of Specific Health Guidance.</p>
Journal
-
- Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock
-
Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock 35 (1), 33-37, 2020
Japan Society of Ningen Dock
- Tweet
Keywords
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390848647562265344
-
- NII Article ID
- 130007923545
-
- NII Book ID
- AA12055286
-
- ISSN
- 21865027
- 18801021
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 030540075
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed