Plagiarism, Hiroshima, and Intertextuality:Ibuse Masuji's Black Rain Reconsidered
この論文をさがす
説明
This paper examines the ongoing controversy about whether or not Ibuse Masuji plagiarize(tōsaku/hyōsetsu/tōyō) from the diary of Shigematsu Shizuma, the most important source that Ibuse used in writing his highly acclaimed a-bomb novel Kuroi ame (Black rain, 1966). By analyzing the contexts of Ibuse’s composition, the strategies and motives of Toyota Seishi(who initially stirred up the plagiarism controversy), and the textual difference between Ibuse’s novel and Shigematsu’s diary, this paper demonstrates that the accusation of Black Rain as a work of plagiarism is a decontextualized and misleading oversimplification that neglects the complex process of literary creation. The intertextual inquiry not only shows that Ibuse’s augmentation of the diary has transformed his most important source and created new meanings but also calls for a rethinking of the place of intertextuality in relation to the creative process in the extraordinary number of plagiarism cases in twentieth-century Japanese literature.
収録刊行物
-
- 麗澤学際ジャーナル
-
麗澤学際ジャーナル 19 (2), 23-55, 2011-09-30
麗澤大学経済学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390853649400668416
-
- NII論文ID
- 40019058562
-
- NII書誌ID
- AN10415677
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 023228937
-
- ISSN
- 09196714
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- 資料種別
- departmental bulletin paper
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- IRDB
- NDLサーチ
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用可