- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Infected Pelvic Lymphocele after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
-
- Murata Daiki
- The Department of Urology, Hiroshima City Asa Hospital
-
- Mita Koji
- The Department of Urology, Hiroshima City Asa Hospital
-
- Nomura Naofumi
- The Department of Urology, Hiroshima City Asa Hospital
-
- Kobatake Kohei
- The Department of Urology, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University
-
- Ohara Shinya
- The Department of Urology, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital
-
- Kato Masato
- The Department of Urology, Hiroshima General Hospital
-
- Mochizuki Hideki
- The Department of Urology, Hiroshima City Asa Hospital
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- ロボット支援前立腺全摘除術における感染性骨盤内リンパ嚢腫の検証
- ロボット シエン ゼンリツセン ゼンテキジョジュツ ニ オケル カンセンセイ コツバン ナイ リンパノウ シュ ノ ケンショウ
Search this article
Description
The aim of this study is to clarify the incidences of infected pelvic lymphocele (IPL) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). From 2016 to 2017, we evaluated 173 consecutive patients who underwent RARP. The transperitoneal approach was used for the RARPs. Limited lymph node dissection was performed in the pelvic lymphoceles region surrounding the obturator nerve. Patients with IPL were defined as those with infected pelvic lymphoceles classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification system grade II or greater and a fever over 38 degrees Celsius. All other cases were defined as nonIPL. IPL was observed in 5 cases (2.9%) that were classified as CD grade II in 2 cases, IIIa in 2 cases, and IVa in 1 case. The most severe case (CD grade IVa) required temporary dialysis for acute renal failure during conservative treatment. While the dissected lymph nodes in the IPL group were sificantly greater than those in the nonlPL group (20.8 ± 7.1 vs 10.3 ± 6.0, P = 0.0298) and the preoperative prostate specific antigen in the IPL group was significantly higher than that in the nonIPL group (15.6 ± 21.7 ng/ml vs 9.0 ± 6.1 ng/ml, P = 0.0359), there were no significant differences in the other background factors between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, the number of dissected lymph nodes was an independent predictive factor for IPL. While the incidences of IPL after RARP were low, the number of dissected lymph nodes was related to IPL.
Journal
-
- 泌尿器科紀要
-
泌尿器科紀要 65 (1), 1-6, 2019-01-31
泌尿器科紀要刊行会
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390853649775973760
-
- NII Article ID
- 120006578960
-
- NII Book ID
- AN00208315
-
- HANDLE
- 2433/236695
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 029474943
-
- ISSN
- 00181994
-
- PubMed
- 30831670
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Article Type
- departmental bulletin paper
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- IRDB
- NDL Search
- PubMed
- CiNii Articles
- OpenAIRE
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Allowed