先駆的二人称から見た存在

DOI 機関リポジトリ Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • センクテキ ニニンショウ カラ ミタ ソンザイ

この論文をさがす

抄録

type:P(論文)

存在は一ではなく,二へと分裂している.オイディプースは真実を知ったとき,記憶と現実の真実の二重性へ飛躍し苦悩した.存在の分裂を「存在の球面理論」で表象できる.球の表面は「対象化できないもの」を表し,裏面は球の中心に位置する視「点」によって「対象化されたもの」を表す.存在の分裂の苦悩を癒すものは,倫理的に与えられる「先駆的二人称」である.先駆的二人称とは,一人称が三人称との出会いを予期し,先駆的に二人称のペルソナをつけることである.先駆的二人称の愛によって,分裂した存在はゆっくりと和んで行く.先駆的二人称から見ることによって,一人称の知とも三人称の知とも異なる二人称の知が始まる.そこに「存在科学」の立場がある.

The structure of being is not unity. Being is split. The sphere model of being is presented to represent the split structure of being, the outside plane of the sphere represents the unobjectifiable aspect of being, and the inside plane of the sphere its objectified aspect. The objectifying "point" of view is located in the center of the sphere. The sphere model represents the split of being topologically. Oedipus jumped into the split of being and bore the agony of the identity crisis to his death. The agony of the split being is consoled by the anticipatory second person. The persona of the second person is put on by the first person in anticipation of the facing of the third person. The being is viewed from the anticipatory second person with love. Ontological science is constructed as the view from the anticipatory second person. The approach of the anticipatory second person toward being is different from the approaches of the first and the third persons. Life is considered as the slow gradual motion toward the unification of the split being.

収録刊行物

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ