A Biomechanical Study Comparing Different Configurations of the Ilizarov Mini-fixator and Plate Fixation

DOI Web Site 参考文献42件
  • Nishimura Reiji
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine
  • Ogino Naohiko
    Gunma Industrial Technology Center
  • Miyawaki Takeshi
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine
  • Matsuura Shintaro
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine
  • Fujii Mikako
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine
  • Akaishi Wataru
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine
  • Bo Hideaki
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine

この論文をさがす

説明

<p>Objectives: The Ilizarov mini-fixator, an external fixator developed for digits, has a structure different from that of general unilateral external fixators. The purpose of this study was to provide information for clinical external fixator selection by clarifying the biomechanical properties of the Ilizarov mini-fixator.</p><p>Methods: Three types of loads were applied to the fracture fixation model using a carbon fiber cylinder as the bone model: axial pressure, 4-point bending, and torsion. Ilizarov mini-fixators with six 1.5 mm pins (6-pin group), four 1.5 mm pins (4-pin group), and four 2.0 mm-threaded-pins (2 mm-pin group) and a group using a 1.5-mm plate (plate group) were set, and the stiffness was compared between these four groups.</p><p>Results: Compared to the 6-pin group, which is the basic configuration of the Ilizarov mini-fixator, the 4-pin group had lower stiffness against axial load and bending, and there was no significant difference in stiffness against torsion. The 2 mm-pin group had high stiffness against axial load and bending and low stiffness against torsion. The plate group exhibited high stiffness against axial pressure and low stiffness against bending and torsion.</p><p>Conclusions: The Ilizarov mini-fixator is a reasonable option for fixing small phalanges. However, other options should be considered for the fixation of larger bones with higher loads. In particular, a configuration with fewer pins such as the 4-pin model may have insufficient strength during early postoperative exercise, even for fixing the phalanges.</p>

収録刊行物

参考文献 (42)*注記

もっと見る

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ