Comparison between O-arm Navigation and Conventional Fluoroscopic Guidance in Corrective Posterior Fixation for Cervical Spinal Injury
-
- Takamatsu Nobutoshi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokushima Prefecture Naruto Hospital, Naruto, Tokushima, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital, Kuramoto, Tokushima, Japan
-
- Manabe Hiroaki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokushima Prefecture Naruto Hospital, Naruto, Tokushima, Japan Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
-
- Yokoo Yuki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokushima Prefecture Naruto Hospital, Naruto, Tokushima, Japan
-
- Wada Kazuma
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokushima Prefecture Naruto Hospital, Naruto, Tokushima, Japan
-
- Hirano Tetsuya
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokushima Prefecture Naruto Hospital, Naruto, Tokushima, Japan
-
- Hibino Naohito
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokushima Prefecture Naruto Hospital, Naruto, Tokushima, Japan
-
- Henmi Tatsuhiko
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokushima Prefecture Naruto Hospital, Naruto, Tokushima, Japan
-
- Chikawa Takashi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokushima Prefecture Naruto Hospital, Naruto, Tokushima, Japan
-
- Sairyo Koichi
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
この論文をさがす
説明
<p>Purpose : To compare the effectiveness of O-arm navigation with that of conventional fluoroscopic guidance in corrective posterior fixation for cervical spinal injury. Methods : This retrospective comparative study involved 11 consecutive patients who underwent corrective posterior fixation using O-arm navigation or conventional fluoroscopy for cervical spinal injury between February 2016 and May 2021. Patient-specific characteristics (age and sex), number of screws, number of pedicle screws, accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, number of vertebral bodies fixed, operating time, and length of hospital stay were analyzed using the t-test. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results : Corrective posterior fixation was performed under O-arm navigation in 5 patients and under conventional fluoroscopic guidance in 6. A significantly greater number of pedicle screws was used in the O-arm group (6.4 vs 2.7, P = 0.046). According to the Neo classification for pedicle screw placement, there were no grade 2 or 3 breaches. No other items showed a significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion : O-arm navigation can improve the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw insertion. Its introduction could expand the indications for use of pedicle screws in posterior fixation of cervical spinal injury beyond those that are possible using conventional fluoroscopy. J. Med. Invest. 69 : 273-277, August, 2022</p>
収録刊行物
-
- The Journal of Medical Investigation
-
The Journal of Medical Investigation 69 (3.4), 273-277, 2022
国立大学法人 徳島大学医学部