Verification of usefulness of the “Physical Assessment Seminar (Advanced Course)” for conducted the pharmaceutical intervention based on the clinical reasoning and pathophysiology assessment and followup survey on the practical physical assessment status after the course

DOI Web Site
  • Imanishi Takashi
    Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University
  • Igarashi Emiko
    Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University Center for Continuing Pharmaceutical Education, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University
  • Fuchida Shin-ichi
    Department of Hematology, JCHO Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center
  • Kadota Noriko
    Department of Nursing, Kyoto College of Nursing
  • Sako Morito
    Department of Pharmacy, Tachibana Medical Corporation Higashi-sumiyoshi Morimoto Hospital
  • Nishimura Yutaka
    Miyako Pharmacy Yakudaimae branch, Miyako Pharmacy Corp.
  • Hosogi Shigekuni
    Department of Clinical and Translational Physiology, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University
  • Kusumoto Masaaki
    Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University Center for Continuing Pharmaceutical Education, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 臨床推論や患者の病態アセスメントから薬学的介入につなげるための「フィジカルアセスメント講座〈実践コース〉」の有用性の検証と受講後のフィジカルアセスメント実践状況に関する追跡調査
  • リンショウ スイロン ヤ カンジャ ノ ビョウタイ アセスメント カラ ヤクガクテキ カイニュウ ニ ツナゲル タメ ノ 「 フィジカルアセスメント コウザ 〈 ジッセン コース 〉 」 ノ ユウヨウセイ ノ ケンショウ ト ジュコウ ゴ ノ フィジカルアセスメント ジッセン ジョウキョウ ニ カンスル ツイセキ チョウサ

Search this article

Abstract

<p>A Questionnaire survey was conducted on the participants of the “Physical Assessment Course (Advanced Course)” before and after the course to verify the change in their understanding of physical assessment (PA). Additionally, a followup survey was conducted to clarify the PA implementation status after the course. The results showed a significantly improved understanding of the vital sign measurement technique in all items in 15 participants. In the followup survey, 13 of the 15 participants responded, and 4 participants (31%) conducted PA on patients, with “general inspection” and “blood pressure assessment” as the most commonly performed procedures. Three of the four participants stated their involvement in “side effect prevention” in terms of their proper use of drugs. Meanwhile, the main reasons for the 9 (69%) participants who were unable to conduct PA were “not in an environment where PA can be conducted” or “no patients for conducted of PA.” These results suggested that this course has certain educational effectiveness with pharmacists’ PA and approximately 30% of the participants conducted PA after the course.</p>

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top