Differences in the muscle activity patterns of trunk extensors based on active straight leg raising test scores: a pilot study

DOI
  • Fujishima Daiki
    Department of Rehabilitation, Kawaguchi Kogyo General Hospital
  • Kikkawa Kazuki
    Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, Saitama Prefectural University
  • Konno Satoru
    Master’s Program in Physical Education, Health and Sport Science, University of Tsukuba
  • Suzuki Katsuya
    Department of Rehabilitation, Saitama Misato General Rehabilitation Hospital
  • Takasaki Hiroshi
    Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Social Services, Saitama Prefectural University

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • Functional Movement Screening Systemにおける自動下肢伸展挙上スコア1と3の者における体幹伸展筋群の筋活動様式の違い
  • ―pilot study―

Abstract

<p>The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the minimum sample size required to determine whether the muscle activity patterns of the superficial trunk extensor muscles differ among individuals when distinct active straight leg raise (ASLR) test scores are measured using a functional movement screening (FMS) system. Eighteen and nine individuals with FMS–ASLR test scores of 1 (with dysfunction) and 3 (without dysfunction), respectively, were included in the analysis. None of the participants had back or leg pain. For the right ASLR test, we calculated the differences in muscle activity delay among the right and left longissimus thoracis, right and left iliocostalis lumborum, and right and left multifidus muscles in relation to the onset of muscle activity in the right rectus femoris muscle. We also calculated the effect size (Hedges’ g) and the required sample size at α = 0.05 and β = 0.2. Our results demonstrate that the group with an FMS-ASLR test score of 1 had a shorter delay in the muscle activities of the right and left longissimus thoracis, right and left iliocostalis lumborum, and right and left multifidus muscles relative to the right rectus femoris muscle than the group with an FMS–ASLR test score of 3. Analysis revealed that the study required a sample size of at least 28 participants (14 with an FMS–ASLR test score of 1 and 14 with an FMS–ASLR test score of 3).</p>

Journal

Details 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390856981716030976
  • DOI
    10.32166/jmpt.22.2_73
  • ISSN
    24344087
    13469223
  • Text Lang
    en
  • Data Source
    • JaLC
  • Abstract License Flag
    Disallowed

Report a problem

Back to top