Accuracy of diagnosing gastritis in barium-contrasted radiography: a single-center prospective study

  • NAKAJIMA Shigemi
    Consortium for Community Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science Department of General Medicine, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Shiga Hospital
  • SAKAMOTO Tsutomu
    Department of Radiology, Jinseikai Konan Hospital
  • YAMASAKI Michio
    Consortium for Community Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science Department of Radiology, Kohka Public Hospital
  • TANAKA Toyohiko
    Department of Radiology, Jinseikai Konan Hospital
  • NAKAHARA Tetsuro
    Nakahara Consultant Radiologists of Imaging Diagnosis
  • NITTA Norihisa
    Department of Radiology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital
  • MATSUO Hisayasu
    Department of Radiology, Omihachiman Community Medical Center
  • FUKUI Tsuyoshi
    Shiga Health Promotion Foundation
  • MIZUTA Kazuhiko
    Shiga Health Promotion Foundation
  • MIURA Katsuyuki
    Department of Social Medicine, Division of Public Health, Shiga University of Medical Science
  • KAKUNO Fumihiko
    Department of Public Health and Welfare, Shiga Prefecture
  • FUJIYAMA Yoshihide
    Consortium for Community Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science Department of General Medicine, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Shiga Hospital

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 胃X線検査における胃炎診断正診率に関する単施設前向き研究

Search this article

Description

<p>Aims: We examined the accuracy of diagnosing gastritis in barium-contrasted radiography, with or without referring to the results of the serum anti-Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) antibody test. We also evaluated the effect of a consensus meeting on the accuracy and discussed its usefulness in education.</p><p>Methods: We recruited people from the participants of health check-up tests in Taga town, and the candidates of the study gave informed consent. We collected upper gastrointestinal X-ray pictures, history of H. pylori eradication therapy, and the results of a serum anti-H. pylori antibody test of the subjects. Six radiologists diagnosed background gastric mucosa and classified the stomach into gastritis and normal. Two radiological diagnoses were made in each participant with or without referring to the result of the serum antibody test (Diagnosis 1 and 2). Thereafter, a consensus meeting was held, and a consensus diagnosis was made among the six radiologists on each participant. Over one month after the consensus meeting, two more radiological diagnoses were made in the same way as done previously (Diagnosis 3 and 4), but the order of the subjects was randomly changed. If the diagnosis was the same as the consensus diagnosis in each subject, we evaluated that the radiologist diagnosed correctly.</p><p>Results: Fifty-four X-ray series of 52 subjects were included in the study. Of them, 34 and 19 stomachs were diagnosed as normal and with gastritis, respectively. We held a consensus meeting, and consensus diagnoses were made in 53 stomachs (98.1%). The mean accuracy ± standard deviation (%) of diagnosing background gastric mucosa in the six radiologists were 81.1±15.0, 91.8±9.6, 87.4±4.7, 96.5±3.7 in Diagnosis 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The mean accuracy significantly elevated from Diagnosis 1 to 2, 3 to 4, and 1 to 4 with reference to the results of the antibody test (P<0.05). However, the variance of accuracy in diagnosis significantly changed from Diagnosis 1 to 3, and 1 to 4 (P<005).</p><p>Conclusion: The accuracy of diagnosing gastritis in radiography was significantly elevated with reference to the results of the antibody test. The standard deviation of diagnosis decreased after the consensus meeting with a significantly changed variance. These procedures were thought appreciable for the education of radiologists.</p>

Journal

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top