Image Quality Evaluation of Medical Image Monitor in Desktop Virtual

DOI
  • Yamamoto T
    Department of Medical Informatics National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Graduate School of Applied Informatics, University of Hyogo
  • Suzuki T
    Department of Medical Informatics National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
  • Narazaki H
    Department of Medical Informatics National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
  • Sakurai R
    Department of Research Promotion and Management National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
  • Ueda K
    Department of Medical Informatics National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
  • Uemura K
    Department of Information Governance National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
  • Hiramatsu H
    Department of Medical Informatics National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Department of Research Promotion and Management National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
  • Takemura T
    Graduate School of Applied Informatics, University of Hyogo

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • デスクトップ仮想環境下における医用画像用モニタの表示画質に関する評価

Search this article

Abstract

<p>　Medical image display monitors require quality control to maintain diagnostic accuracy, for which the method is defined in the guidelines provided by the Japan Medical Imaging and Radiological Systems Industries Association. In contrast, more medical institutions recently build their hospital information system terminals on servers and desktop virtual infrastructure. With the screen processed in the virtual server, transmitted to, and displayed on the client PC, the technology to realize desktop virtualization differs greatly from the conventional client-server system in the screen display method. The influence on image diagnosis, and the quality control method of the medical image display monitor in the hospital information system built in such an environment are unknown. This study compared the client-server system introduced in many facilities with the VDI method and the RDP method of desktop virtualization systems, the subject of this evaluation, on the correctness of images displayed on the medical image display monitor, based on the evaluation method specified in the guidelines. As a result, no difference was found in the results of the evaluation using the quality control method specified in the guidelines, suggesting that there is no impact on image diagnosis even in medical institutions with desktop virtualization introduced. It was also clarified that the quality control of medical monitors can be handled in the conventional way.</p>

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top