国境と民主的平和論
-
- 木原 淳
- 福島工業高等専門学校
書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- Border and the Democratic Peace by Kant
- 「永遠平和論」における国家の人格性との関わり
この論文をさがす
説明
This paper aims to examine the problems of so-called democratic peace theory and the conditions of wars between nation states. This argumentation starts from Kant's 'On Perpetual Peace'. As the conditions of perpetual peace. Kant claimed that every political system shall be republic (constitutional democracy). This claim contains 2 elements. The one is that the citizens who actually fight against other nations don't prefer to begin war. Democracy prevents policy decision-makers from war.And the other point is that a state should be public and moral person. This is the condition of republic state. On the contrary, absolute monarchs regard land and people as exchangeable and acquirable property, so they can easily begin war for the sake of their own benefit. Therefore, absolute monarchy is threat to peace. This thought has developed as the democratic peace theory, which is today advocated by Michael Doyle and strongly supported by John Rawls. However, the democratic state as public and collective person intensified wars between nation states in 19-20 century, associating national identity with individual identity. Land became the divine element of state as same as the bodyof individual persons.
収録刊行物
-
- 法哲学年報
-
法哲学年報 2010 (0), 188-199, 2011
日本法哲学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390862732250350080
-
- ISSN
- 24351075
- 03872890
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可