- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Influence of material and tightening torque on the subsidence of implant scan bodies
-
- Morita Daiki
- Section of Fixed Prosthodontics, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
-
- Matsuzaki Tatsuya
- Section of Fixed Prosthodontics, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
-
- Sakai Nobuo
- Mechanical and Control Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu, Japan
-
- Ogino Yoichiro
- Section of Fixed Prosthodontics, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
-
- Atsuta Ikiru
- Section of Fixed Prosthodontics, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
-
- Ayukawa Yasunori
- Section of Implant and Rehabilitative Dentistry, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Search this article
Description
<p>Purpose: To compare abutment and scan body subsidence and determine the appropriate tightening torque value for a scan body that can accurately replicate abutment subsidence.</p><p>Methods: An internally tapered connection implant was placed in a bone model. The titanium abutment (Ti Abut), polyetheretherketone scan body (PEEK SB), and titanium scan body (Ti SB) were tightened to torque values of 10 or 35 Ncm, with the 10 Ncm models used as reference models. Both the 10 and 35 Ncm models were scanned using a laboratory scanner. The vertical displacements of the Ti Abut, PEEK SB, and Ti SB at each torque value were determined using three-dimensional analysis software.</p><p>Results: Upon tightening the scan bodies and abutment to 35 Ncm, the displacement was significantly greater than when tightened to 10 Ncm (P < 0.01). At 35 Ncm, Ti SB and Ti Abut showed significantly greater displacements than PEEK SB, whereas no significant difference was observed between Ti SB and Ti Abut.</p><p>Conclusions: The titanium scan bodies, when tightened at 35 Ncm, accurately replicated titanium abutment subsidence, unlike the PEEK scan bodies.</p>
Journal
-
- Journal of Prosthodontic Research
-
Journal of Prosthodontic Research advpub (0), 2025
Japan Prosthodontic Society