<i>Rational Acceptability and Truth</i>
-
- YOKOYAMA Mikiko
- Faculty of Library, Information and Media Science, University of Tsukuba
Description
<p> In “From Alethic Anti-realism to Alethic Realism” Künne distinguishes between alethic realism and alethic anti-realism. This article examines whether or not alethic anti-realism is appropriate, when we take the position of using commonsense to settle a philosophical problem. To that end, I will first review Künne's theory. Next, I will point out that Putnam's natural realists are alethic realists, that Wright's moderate internalists are alethic ani-realists, and that Wright argues against Putnam. Then, I will argue that Künne's conception of truth escapes the criticism of Wright's argument. Lastly I will also review Tennant's argument for anti-realism, and argue that in spite of Tennant's argument, alethic anti-realism is not appropriate when considered from a commonsense point of view. </p>
Journal
-
- Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
-
Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 29 (0), 27-39, 2020
Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
- Tweet
Keywords
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1391412326424510976
-
- NII Article ID
- 130007940569
-
- ISSN
- 18841228
- 04530691
-
- Text Lang
- en
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed