「神の照明なしに人間は何かを知りうるか」（1） ─ ガンのヘンリクス『定期討論のスンマ』a.1, q. 2 ─

機関リポジトリ HANDLE Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • ホンヤク(ラワ タイヤク) カミ ノ ショウメイ ナシ ニ ニンゲン ワ ナニ カ オ シリウル カ(1)ガン ノ ヘンリクス 『 テイキ トウロン ノ スンマ 』 a.1,q.2
  • utrum contingat hominem aliquid scire sine divina illustratione Henrici de Gandavo Quaestiones ordinariae (Summa), a.1, q. 2: A Japanese translation with the Latin text, an introduction, and notes

この論文をさがす

抄録

This is a Japanese translation with the Latin text, an introduction, and notes of Henry of Ghent's Quaestiones ordinariae (Summa), a.1, q.2. Henry's Latin text used here is from Henrici de Gandavo Quaestiones ordinariae (Summa), art.1‒5, ed. Gordon A. Wilson (Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. De Wulf-Mansion Centre. Series II: Henrici de Gandavo Opera Omnia, vol.21), Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2005, pp.3‒28. I have received written permission to use it from the editor Prof. Gordon A. Wilson with the following words, "The Latin text is copyrighted and is published here with the permission of the editor, and with the knowledge and consent of the De Wulf-Mansion Center and Leuven University Press." I am much obliged to Prof. Wilson and those others concerned. Henry of Ghent (Henricus de Gandavo/ Gandavensis; d. 1293) is a thinker active and most influential at Paris University during the last quarter of the 13th century between the age of Thomas Aquinas (d. 1274) and Duns Scotus (d. 1308). The second question (q.2), utrum contingat hominem aliquid scire sine divina illustratione, in the first article (a.1) on the possibility of human knowledge (de possibilitate sciendi) in Henry's Summa, considers whether a human being can know something without divine illumination. While many medieval thinkers before Henry assumed that the sincere truth of knowledge requires some divine illumination, most thinkers after him, in particular Duns Scotus, denied this doctrine. So Henry was the last great thinker who defends the theory of divine illumination.

翻訳（羅和対訳）

収録刊行物

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ