Reevaluation for Overlooked Signs of Cervical Smears in Cases of the Uterine Cervical Adenocarcinoma

  • KUTSUZAWA,Takesi
    Department of Obstetrics aud Gynecology, School of Medicine,Hokkaido University
  • YAMADA,Yoshitaka
    Department of Obstetrics aud Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University
  • ISHIZAKI,Yoshiaki
    Department of Obstetrics aud Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University
  • SATO,Chikara
    Department of Obstetrics aud Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University
  • KANEKO,Masahiro
    Department of Obstetrics aud Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University
  • MORIYA,Syouji
    Department of Obstetrics aud Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University
  • ICHlNOE,Kihyoe
    Department of Obstetrics aud Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 子宮頚部腺癌における細胞診偽陰性例の再検討

Search this article

Abstract

Though the incidence of adenocarcinoma is not high, this cancer has been a matter for discussionon the grounds that mass screening frequently shows "false negative" cases. The purpose, of this study was to clarify the factors which had caused a misdiagnosis through the reinvestigation of patients' previous cervical smears. In spite of continuous smear tests at various intervals, there was a long delay in the diagnosis, ranging from 6 months to 5 years, in 14 patients out of 51 cases of cervical adenocarcinoma treated in our hospitals during the past 6 years. In 12 of these 14 cases a careful reexamination of previously overlooked smear preparations revealed definite signs of adenocarcinoma in most cases (86%). A cause of the delay in diagnosing adenocarcinoma seems likely to be related to cytological inspections rather than to the process of taking smears. Characteristics overlooked signs in the misdiagnosed smears were either "rosette-like" arrangements or "irregular clusters of sheet-like" arrangements. The rosette-like arrangements a pattern indicative of cervical adenocarcinoma, were found in 10 of the above cases (71%). The findings obtained suggest that for the diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma, cytological diagnosis by smear could be made even in the early pre-clinical stage and when cervical adenocarcinoma is suspected on a cytological basis in this stage, conization is also strongly recommended despite the punch biopsy.

Journal

Citations (4)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top