Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma: Japanese patients from the <scp>CLEAR</scp> study

  • Masatoshi Eto
    Department of Urology Kyushu University Hospital Fukuoka Japan
  • Toshio Takagi
    Department of Urology Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital Tokyo Japan
  • Go Kimura
    Department of Urology Nippon Medical School Hospital Tokyo Japan
  • Satoshi Fukasawa
    Prostate Center and Division of Urology Chiba Cancer Center Chiba Japan
  • Satoshi Tamada
    Department of Urology Bell‐land General Hospital Osaka Japan
  • Yuji Miura
    Department of Medical Oncology Toranomon Hospital Tokyo Japan
  • Mototsugu Oya
    Department of Urology Keio University Hospital Tokyo Japan
  • Naoto Sassa
    Department of Urology Aichi Medical University Aichi Japan
  • Satoshi Anai
    Department of Urology Nara Medical University Nara Japan
  • Masahiro Nozawa
    Department of Urology Kindai University Hospital Osaka Japan
  • Hideki Sakai
    Department of Urology Nagasaki University Hospital Nagasaki Japan
  • Rodolfo Perini
    Merck & Co., Inc. Rahway New Jersey USA
  • Wataru Yusa
    Japan and Asia Clinical Development Department Oncology Business Group, Eisai Co., Ltd. Tokyo Japan
  • Hiroki Ikezawa
    Clinical Data Science Department, Medicine Development Center Eisai Co., Ltd. Tokyo Japan
  • Tomoyuki Narita
    Lenvima Alliance Management Eisai Co., Ltd. Tokyo Japan
  • Yoshihiko Tomita
    Department of Urology, Department of Molecular Oncology Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine Niigata Japan

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The phase 3 CLEAR study demonstrated statistically significantly improved efficacy with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib, including progression‐free survival and overall survival, in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma. This subset analysis investigated efficacy and safety in Japanese patients randomized to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or sunitinib in the CLEAR study.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Progression‐free survival, overall survival, tumor response, and safety were assessed in Japanese patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma randomized to receive lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 42) or sunitinib (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 31). Efficacy outcomes were analyzed by independent imaging review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Progression‐free survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with sunitinib (median, 22.1 vs. 10.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20–0.74). Median overall survival was not estimable in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm and 30.6 months in the sunitinib arm (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.39–3.66). Overall survival adjusted for the imbalance of Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center prognostic risk group favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.18–2.39). Objective response rate (69.0% vs. 45.2%; odds ratio, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.03–7.10) was higher and median duration of response (20.3 vs. 9.1 months) was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib. Grade ≥ 3 treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 95.2% versus 87.1% of patients in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib arms.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>These findings support lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a potential first‐line treatment for Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.</jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ