Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma: Japanese patients from the <scp>CLEAR</scp> study
-
- Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology Kyushu University Hospital Fukuoka Japan
-
- Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital Tokyo Japan
-
- Go Kimura
- Department of Urology Nippon Medical School Hospital Tokyo Japan
-
- Satoshi Fukasawa
- Prostate Center and Division of Urology Chiba Cancer Center Chiba Japan
-
- Satoshi Tamada
- Department of Urology Bell‐land General Hospital Osaka Japan
-
- Yuji Miura
- Department of Medical Oncology Toranomon Hospital Tokyo Japan
-
- Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology Keio University Hospital Tokyo Japan
-
- Naoto Sassa
- Department of Urology Aichi Medical University Aichi Japan
-
- Satoshi Anai
- Department of Urology Nara Medical University Nara Japan
-
- Masahiro Nozawa
- Department of Urology Kindai University Hospital Osaka Japan
-
- Hideki Sakai
- Department of Urology Nagasaki University Hospital Nagasaki Japan
-
- Rodolfo Perini
- Merck & Co., Inc. Rahway New Jersey USA
-
- Wataru Yusa
- Japan and Asia Clinical Development Department Oncology Business Group, Eisai Co., Ltd. Tokyo Japan
-
- Hiroki Ikezawa
- Clinical Data Science Department, Medicine Development Center Eisai Co., Ltd. Tokyo Japan
-
- Tomoyuki Narita
- Lenvima Alliance Management Eisai Co., Ltd. Tokyo Japan
-
- Yoshihiko Tomita
- Department of Urology, Department of Molecular Oncology Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine Niigata Japan
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The phase 3 CLEAR study demonstrated statistically significantly improved efficacy with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib, including progression‐free survival and overall survival, in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma. This subset analysis investigated efficacy and safety in Japanese patients randomized to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or sunitinib in the CLEAR study.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Progression‐free survival, overall survival, tumor response, and safety were assessed in Japanese patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma randomized to receive lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 42) or sunitinib (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 31). Efficacy outcomes were analyzed by independent imaging review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Progression‐free survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with sunitinib (median, 22.1 vs. 10.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20–0.74). Median overall survival was not estimable in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm and 30.6 months in the sunitinib arm (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.39–3.66). Overall survival adjusted for the imbalance of Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center prognostic risk group favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.18–2.39). Objective response rate (69.0% vs. 45.2%; odds ratio, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.03–7.10) was higher and median duration of response (20.3 vs. 9.1 months) was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib. Grade ≥ 3 treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 95.2% versus 87.1% of patients in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib arms.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>These findings support lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a potential first‐line treatment for Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.</jats:p></jats:sec>
収録刊行物
-
- Cancer Medicine
-
Cancer Medicine 12 (6), 6902-6912, 2022-12
Wiley