Continuity and egalitarianism in the evaluation of infinite utility streams
この論文をさがす
説明
There exists a utilitarian tradition a la Sidgwick of treating equal generations equally. Diamond showed that there exists no social evaluation ordering over infinite utility streams in the presence of the Pareto principle, the Sidgwick principle, and continuity. Instead of requiring the Sidgwick principle of procedural fairness, we focus on two principles of distributional egalitarianism along the line of the Pigou–Dalton transfer principle and the Lorenz domination principle, and show that there exists no social evaluation relation satisfying one of these egalitarian principles and the weakened continuity and rationality axioms even in the absence of the Pareto principle.
収録刊行物
-
- Social choice and welfare
-
Social choice and welfare 31 (2), 179-191, 2008-08
Springer Berlin
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1050282677629155712
-
- NII書誌ID
- AA10484623
-
- ISSN
- 1432217X
- 01761714
-
- HANDLE
- 2241/103685
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- 資料種別
- journal article
-
- データソース種別
-
- IRDB
- KAKEN
- OpenAIRE