- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
In situ HNO<sub>3</sub> to NO<sub><i>y</i></sub> instrument comparison during SOLVE
Search this article
Description
<jats:p>Measurements of HNO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> mixing ratios from the chemical ionization mass spectrometer have been critically compared with simultaneous measurements of total gas phase NO<jats:sub><jats:italic>y</jats:italic></jats:sub> from the NO chemiluminescence detector aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during the SAGE 3 Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). The data were obtained in the arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in the winter of 1999–2000. A brief comparison to the NO<jats:sub><jats:italic>y</jats:italic></jats:sub> instrument aboard the NASA ER‐2 is also presented. The time responses, detection limits, relative precision, and stability of relative calibrations for the instruments were in excellent agreement throughout the mission. However, the average slope of the HNO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> to NO<jats:sub><jats:italic>y</jats:italic></jats:sub> correlation was 1.13 ± 0.03 overall and 1.06 ± 0.03 in stratospheric air, indicating that the two measurements had a systematic calibration offset. Possible sources for the offset error are presented, and methods to reduce the calibration error in future flights are suggested.</jats:p>
Journal
-
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
-
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 108 2003-03-27
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1871428067673021568
-
- ISSN
- 01480227
-
- Data Source
-
- OpenAIRE